Hummel on 3 D
نویسنده
چکیده
Yet even this is predated by John Anderton, who was granted a US Patent on July 9th, 1895 for “Method By Which Pictures Projected Upon Screens By Magic Lantern Are Seen In Relief.” Anderton had already obtained patents in England (July 7, 1891) and France (Oct. 8, 1892). His technique utilized polarized projected images and glasses; however he used polarizing crystals instead of thin sheets of plastic, so it never ended up being very practical. What we’re witnessing today are improvements on technologies that are over a century old. Stereoscopic cinematography is more complex than one article can cover. This is intended as a primer on the basic constructs of a complex medium, one that I hope will encourage further research on the subject. In order to save some ink, we will cave to convention and henceforth refer to stereoscopic cinematography as “3-D.”
منابع مشابه
Combining Bodies of Dependent Information
Recently, Hummel and Landy proposed a variation on the Dempster/Shafer theory of evidence that tracks only the first and second order statistics of the opinions of sets of experts. This extension permits the tracking of statistics of probabilistic opinions, however, as opposed to tracking merely Boolean opinions (or possibilities within the "frame of discernment"). Both the Dempster/Shafer form...
متن کاملUnusually versatile plant genus Azadirachta with many useful and so far incompletely exploited properties for agriculture, medicine and industry
Hummel, HE, Langner SS, Hein DF, Sanguanpong U, Schmutterer H 1 Chair of Organic Agriculture, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany 2 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Institute of Natural Resources Sustainability, Champaign,USA 3 Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Patumthani 12100, Thailand 4 Wiesenstrasse 55, D-35435 Krofdorf-Gleibe...
متن کاملBetter limited systematicity in hand than structural descriptions in the bush: A reply to Hummel
Letter to the Editor Better limited systematicity in hand than structural descriptions in the bush: A reply to Hummel Hummel's reference to " countless other ways " in which our model of structure processing is deficient, along with the claim that it cannot account for " any of the hallmarks of the human ability to perceive spatial relations, " exemplifies the tactic favored by the defenders of...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009